2016-11-16 17:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
# frozen_string_literal: true
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class UserMailer < Devise::Mailer
|
|
|
|
layout 'mailer'
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-24 20:50:09 +00:00
|
|
|
helper :accounts
|
2018-01-28 23:22:20 +00:00
|
|
|
helper :application
|
2017-04-17 22:16:32 +00:00
|
|
|
helper :instance
|
2020-02-01 14:42:12 +00:00
|
|
|
helper :statuses
|
2022-04-07 12:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
helper :formatting
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
helper :routing
|
2017-04-17 22:16:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
before_action :set_instance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default to: -> { @resource.email }
|
2018-01-16 05:26:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-12-13 19:03:16 +00:00
|
|
|
def confirmation_instructions(user, token, *, **)
|
2016-11-16 17:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
@token = token
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
2017-11-07 18:06:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2018-08-26 17:22:46 +00:00
|
|
|
mail to: @resource.unconfirmed_email.presence || @resource.email,
|
2018-01-02 15:55:00 +00:00
|
|
|
subject: I18n.t(@resource.pending_reconfirmation? ? 'devise.mailer.reconfirmation_instructions.subject' : 'devise.mailer.confirmation_instructions.subject', instance: @instance),
|
|
|
|
template_name: @resource.pending_reconfirmation? ? 'reconfirmation_instructions' : 'confirmation_instructions'
|
2016-11-16 17:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2022-12-13 19:03:16 +00:00
|
|
|
def reset_password_instructions(user, token, *, **)
|
2016-11-16 17:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
@token = token
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
2017-11-07 18:06:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_devise_subject
|
2016-11-16 17:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2022-12-13 19:03:16 +00:00
|
|
|
def password_change(user, *, **)
|
2016-11-16 17:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
2017-11-07 18:06:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_devise_subject
|
2016-11-16 17:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2018-01-02 15:55:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-12-13 19:03:16 +00:00
|
|
|
def email_changed(user, *, **)
|
2018-01-02 15:55:00 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
2018-01-02 15:55:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_devise_subject
|
2018-01-02 15:55:00 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2018-01-18 18:17:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-12-13 19:03:16 +00:00
|
|
|
def two_factor_enabled(user, *, **)
|
2019-09-18 14:37:27 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
2019-09-18 14:37:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_devise_subject
|
2019-09-18 14:37:27 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2022-12-13 19:03:16 +00:00
|
|
|
def two_factor_disabled(user, *, **)
|
2019-09-18 14:37:27 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
2019-09-18 14:37:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_devise_subject
|
2019-09-18 14:37:27 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2022-12-13 19:03:16 +00:00
|
|
|
def two_factor_recovery_codes_changed(user, *, **)
|
2019-09-18 14:37:27 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
2019-09-18 14:37:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_devise_subject
|
2019-09-18 14:37:27 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2022-12-13 19:03:16 +00:00
|
|
|
def webauthn_enabled(user, *, **)
|
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466)
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466)
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_devise_subject
|
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466)
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2022-12-13 19:03:16 +00:00
|
|
|
def webauthn_disabled(user, *, **)
|
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466)
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466)
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_devise_subject
|
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466)
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def webauthn_credential_added(user, webauthn_credential)
|
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
@webauthn_credential = webauthn_credential
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466)
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: I18n.t('devise.mailer.webauthn_credential.added.subject')
|
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466)
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def webauthn_credential_deleted(user, webauthn_credential)
|
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
@webauthn_credential = webauthn_credential
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466)
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: I18n.t('devise.mailer.webauthn_credential.deleted.subject')
|
Add WebAuthn as an alternative 2FA method (#14466)
* feat: add possibility of adding WebAuthn security keys to use as 2FA
This adds a basic UI for enabling WebAuthn 2FA. We did a little refactor
to the Settings page for editing the 2FA methods – now it will list the
methods that are available to the user (TOTP and WebAuthn) and from
there they'll be able to add or remove any of them.
Also, it's worth mentioning that for enabling WebAuthn it's required to
have TOTP enabled, so the first time that you go to the 2FA Settings
page, you'll be asked to set it up.
This work was inspired by the one donde by Github in their platform, and
despite it could be approached in different ways, we decided to go with
this one given that we feel that this gives a great UX.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add request for WebAuthn as second factor at login if enabled
This commits adds the feature for using WebAuthn as a second factor for
login when enabled.
If users have WebAuthn enabled, now a page requesting for the use of a
WebAuthn credential for log in will appear, although a link redirecting
to the old page for logging in using a two-factor code will also be
present.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: add possibility of deleting WebAuthn Credentials
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: disable WebAuthn when an Admin disables 2FA for a user
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* feat: remove ability to disable TOTP leaving only WebAuthn as 2FA
Following examples form other platforms like Github, we decided to make
Webauthn 2FA secondary to 2FA with TOTP, so that we removed the
possibility of removing TOTP authentication only, leaving users with
just WEbAuthn as 2FA. Instead, users will have to click on 'Disable 2FA'
in order to remove second factor auth.
The reason for WebAuthn being secondary to TOPT is that in that way,
users will still be able to log in using their code from their phone's
application if they don't have their security keys with them – or maybe
even lost them.
* We had to change a little the flow for setting up TOTP, given that now
it's possible to setting up again if you already had TOTP, in order to
let users modify their authenticator app – given that now it's not
possible for them to disable TOTP and set it up again with another
authenticator app.
So, basically, now instead of storing the new `otp_secret` in the
user, we store it in the session until the process of set up is
finished.
This was because, as it was before, when users clicked on 'Edit' in
the new two-factor methods lists page, but then went back without
finishing the flow, their `otp_secret` had been changed therefore
invalidating their previous authenticator app, making them unable to
log in again using TOTP.
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
* refactor: fix eslint errors
The PR build was failing given that linting returning some errors.
This commit attempts to fix them.
* refactor: normalize i18n translations
The build was failing given that i18n translations files were not
normalized.
This commits fixes that.
* refactor: avoid having the webauthn gem locked to a specific version
* refactor: use symbols for routes without '/'
* refactor: avoid sending webauthn disabled email when 2FA is disabled
When an admins disable 2FA for users, we were sending two mails
to them, one notifying that 2FA was disabled and the other to notify
that WebAuthn was disabled.
As the second one is redundant since the first email includes it, we can
remove it and send just one email to users.
* refactor: avoid creating new env variable for webauthn_origin config
* refactor: improve flash error messages for webauthn pages
Co-authored-by: Facundo Padula <facundo.padula@cedarcode.com>
2020-08-24 14:46:27 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-18 18:17:25 +00:00
|
|
|
def welcome(user)
|
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
2018-01-18 18:17:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-03-01 12:16:53 +00:00
|
|
|
@suggestions = AccountSuggestions.new(@resource.account).get(5)
|
|
|
|
@tags = Trends.tags.query.allowed.limit(5)
|
|
|
|
@has_account_fields = @resource.account.display_name.present? || @resource.account.note.present? || @resource.account.avatar.present?
|
|
|
|
@has_active_relationships = @resource.account.active_relationships.exists?
|
|
|
|
@has_statuses = @resource.account.statuses.exists?
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_i18n_subject
|
2018-01-18 18:17:25 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2018-02-21 22:21:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def backup_ready(user, backup)
|
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
@backup = backup
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-15 12:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return unless @resource.active_for_authentication?
|
2018-02-21 22:21:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_i18n_subject
|
2018-02-21 22:21:32 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
Add moderation warnings (#9519)
* Add moderation warnings
Replace individual routes for disabling, silencing, and suspending
a user, as well as the report update route, with a unified account
action controller that allows you to select an action (none,
disable, silence, suspend) as well as whether it should generate an
e-mail notification with optional custom text. That notification,
with the optional custom text, is saved as a warning.
Additionally, there are warning presets you can configure to save
time when performing the above.
* Use Account#local_username_and_domain
2018-12-22 19:02:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-17 08:41:33 +00:00
|
|
|
def warning(user, warning)
|
Add moderation warnings (#9519)
* Add moderation warnings
Replace individual routes for disabling, silencing, and suspending
a user, as well as the report update route, with a unified account
action controller that allows you to select an action (none,
disable, silence, suspend) as well as whether it should generate an
e-mail notification with optional custom text. That notification,
with the optional custom text, is saved as a warning.
Additionally, there are warning presets you can configure to save
time when performing the above.
* Use Account#local_username_and_domain
2018-12-22 19:02:09 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
@warning = warning
|
2022-01-17 08:41:33 +00:00
|
|
|
@statuses = @warning.statuses.includes(:account, :preloadable_poll, :media_attachments, active_mentions: [:account])
|
Add moderation warnings (#9519)
* Add moderation warnings
Replace individual routes for disabling, silencing, and suspending
a user, as well as the report update route, with a unified account
action controller that allows you to select an action (none,
disable, silence, suspend) as well as whether it should generate an
e-mail notification with optional custom text. That notification,
with the optional custom text, is saved as a warning.
Additionally, there are warning presets you can configure to save
time when performing the above.
* Use Account#local_username_and_domain
2018-12-22 19:02:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: I18n.t("user_mailer.warning.subject.#{@warning.action}", acct: "@#{user.account.local_username_and_domain}")
|
Add moderation warnings (#9519)
* Add moderation warnings
Replace individual routes for disabling, silencing, and suspending
a user, as well as the report update route, with a unified account
action controller that allows you to select an action (none,
disable, silence, suspend) as well as whether it should generate an
e-mail notification with optional custom text. That notification,
with the optional custom text, is saved as a warning.
Additionally, there are warning presets you can configure to save
time when performing the above.
* Use Account#local_username_and_domain
2018-12-22 19:02:09 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-06-09 08:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-14 20:27:53 +00:00
|
|
|
def appeal_approved(user, appeal)
|
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
@appeal = appeal
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_i18n_subject(date: l(@appeal.created_at))
|
2022-02-14 20:27:53 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def appeal_rejected(user, appeal)
|
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
@appeal = appeal
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_i18n_subject(date: l(@appeal.created_at))
|
2022-02-14 20:27:53 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-06 18:58:12 +00:00
|
|
|
def suspicious_sign_in(user, remote_ip, user_agent, timestamp)
|
2020-06-09 08:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
@remote_ip = remote_ip
|
|
|
|
@user_agent = user_agent
|
|
|
|
@detection = Browser.new(user_agent)
|
|
|
|
@timestamp = timestamp.to_time.utc
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mail subject: default_i18n_subject
|
2020-06-09 08:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-01-22 13:55:43 +00:00
|
|
|
def failed_2fa(user, remote_ip, user_agent, timestamp)
|
|
|
|
@resource = user
|
|
|
|
@remote_ip = remote_ip
|
|
|
|
@user_agent = user_agent
|
|
|
|
@detection = Browser.new(user_agent)
|
|
|
|
@timestamp = timestamp.to_time.utc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I18n.with_locale(locale) do
|
|
|
|
mail subject: default_i18n_subject
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
private
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-27 09:57:16 +00:00
|
|
|
def default_devise_subject
|
|
|
|
I18n.t(:subject, scope: ['devise.mailer', action_name])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def set_instance
|
|
|
|
@instance = Rails.configuration.x.local_domain
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
def locale
|
2023-12-18 21:49:17 +00:00
|
|
|
@resource.locale.presence || I18n.locale || I18n.default_locale
|
2022-05-28 12:32:08 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|
2016-11-16 17:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
end
|