74eff5456c
* First lame pass at adding optional git commit hash display on /about/more page. Currently, this is implemented by checking for the existence of a file called CURRENT_RELEASE in the home directory of the user running Mastodon. If the file exists, its contents are added. I've modified my update process to include the following before precompiling assets: git log -1 | head -n 1 | cut -d " " -f2 > ~/CURRENT_RELEASE That puts the current commit hash into the file ~/CURRENT_RELEASE, but you figured that out because you're a smart cookie. As I am quite sure this is a horrible methodology for implementing this, I look forward to any improvements you have to offer! * Updated to handle instances that share a user - the CURRENT_RELEASE file now lives in the instance's base directory. This also requires modifying the update hook to `git log -1 | head -n 1 | cut -d " " -f2 > CURRENT_RELEASE` |
||
|---|---|---|
| app | ||
| bin | ||
| config | ||
| db | ||
| docs | ||
| lib | ||
| log | ||
| nanobox | ||
| public | ||
| spec | ||
| storybook | ||
| streaming | ||
| vendor/assets | ||
| .babelrc | ||
| .buildpacks | ||
| .codeclimate.yml | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .editorconfig | ||
| .env.nanobox | ||
| .env.production.sample | ||
| .env.test | ||
| .env.vagrant | ||
| .eslintignore | ||
| .eslintrc.yml | ||
| .foreman | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .haml-lint.yml | ||
| .nanoignore | ||
| .nvmrc | ||
| .postcssrc.yml | ||
| .profile | ||
| .rspec | ||
| .rubocop.yml | ||
| .ruby-version | ||
| .scss-lint.yml | ||
| .slugignore | ||
| .travis.yml | ||
| Aptfile | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| Capfile | ||
| Dockerfile | ||
| Gemfile | ||
| Gemfile.lock | ||
| ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| Procfile | ||
| Procfile.dev | ||
| README.md | ||
| Rakefile | ||
| Vagrantfile | ||
| app.json | ||
| boxfile.yml | ||
| config.ru | ||
| docker-compose.yml | ||
| docker_entrypoint.sh | ||
| package.json | ||
| scalingo.json | ||
| yarn.lock | ||
README.md
Mastodon Glitch Edition
Now with automated deploys!
So here's the deal: we all work on this code, and then it runs on dev.glitch.social and anyone who uses that does so absolutely at their own risk. can you dig it?