SM64: DDD 100 Coins in Entrance Rando should expect sub removal (#711)
I brought this up in #super-mario-64, and the minor consensus is that 100 Coins is "possible", the same way Red Coins is possible. According to a FAQ online, DDD has 106 coins. That means you are still required to get at least 5 of the red coins in order to get the 100 coin star. If we already have a rule stating the Red Coins require the sub to be removed (by reaching Bowser in the Fire Sea), it should apply to the 100 coins as well. The consensus on it being "possible" was that it requires a very specific triple jump. There is no "Strict" category for this since it isn't caps/cannons-based, but it is extremely unreasonable to casual play. If you want to sequence break it, go for it, but I don't think it should be expected.
This commit is contained in:
parent
37b569eca6
commit
cd9f8f3119
|
@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ def set_rules(world, player: int, area_connections):
|
|||
add_rule(world.get_location("BBH: Eye to Eye in the Secret Room", player), lambda state: state.has("Vanish Cap", player))
|
||||
add_rule(world.get_location("DDD: Collect the Caps...", player), lambda state: state.has("Vanish Cap", player))
|
||||
add_rule(world.get_location("DDD: Pole-Jumping for Red Coins", player), lambda state: state.can_reach("Bowser in the Fire Sea", 'Region', player))
|
||||
add_rule(world.get_location("DDD: 100 Coins", player), lambda state: state.can_reach("Bowser in the Fire Sea", 'Region', player))
|
||||
add_rule(world.get_location("SL: Into the Igloo", player), lambda state: state.has("Vanish Cap", player))
|
||||
add_rule(world.get_location("WDW: Quick Race Through Downtown!", player), lambda state: state.has("Vanish Cap", player))
|
||||
add_rule(world.get_location("RR: Somewhere Over the Rainbow", player), lambda state: state.has("Cannon Unlock RR", player))
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue